[ad_1]
Gurugram: Former Congress Minister Sukhbir has come to this conclusion in the investigation of the district administration Kataria And four others have been running commercial establishments for years occupying government land along the old Delhi-Gurugram road. These include a car dealership, an automobile repair shop, a sweet shop, a dhaba and some eateries.
Kataria, who was sports minister in the Bhupender Singh Hooda-led government between 2009 and 2014, denied the findings of the inquiry on Monday. He said the property has been with his family for decades and he approached the local court over the matter.
The case came to light in May 2020, when a Gurugram resident and RTI activist OP Kataria filed a complaint with the state vigilance bureau, alleging that 3.8 acres of land in Inayatpur had been allotted to the Haryana State Industries and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) is not transferred.
Deputy Commissioner Nishant Yadav last month directed the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) to investigate and submit a report.
According to the inquiry report, a total of 55.5 acres of land near Atul Kataria Chowk was acquired by the Haryana government in 1972.
In the next two years, the land except the 3.8-acre portion was transferred to HSIIDC. The report said that it was believed that a parcel of land, which fell “within the 900m restricted zone of the Air Force ammunition depot” (the buffer zone is now 300m) could be the “reason” for not handing it over. At HSIIDC in the 70s.
However, the investigation “found evidence of encroachment on government-acquired land”, a DTCP official said.
As part of the investigation, HSIIDC also conducted a physical survey of the area, which showed the alleged encroachments of Kataria, Chetan Thakran, Roshni Dahiya, Moti Lal Kataria and Kulraj Kataria.
Based on its report, the DTCP this week wrote to the MCG to demolish the structure. “This is government-acquired land and we have written to MCG to vacate the encroachment,” said the DTCP official quoted above.
Kataria said, this is his family’s ancestral land. “The demarcation of the land was decided (by HSIIDC) without taking our part in it. We have objections to this demarcation and have approached a Gurugram court,” he said.
Kataria, who was sports minister in the Bhupender Singh Hooda-led government between 2009 and 2014, denied the findings of the inquiry on Monday. He said the property has been with his family for decades and he approached the local court over the matter.
The case came to light in May 2020, when a Gurugram resident and RTI activist OP Kataria filed a complaint with the state vigilance bureau, alleging that 3.8 acres of land in Inayatpur had been allotted to the Haryana State Industries and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIIDC) is not transferred.
Deputy Commissioner Nishant Yadav last month directed the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) to investigate and submit a report.
According to the inquiry report, a total of 55.5 acres of land near Atul Kataria Chowk was acquired by the Haryana government in 1972.
In the next two years, the land except the 3.8-acre portion was transferred to HSIIDC. The report said that it was believed that a parcel of land, which fell “within the 900m restricted zone of the Air Force ammunition depot” (the buffer zone is now 300m) could be the “reason” for not handing it over. At HSIIDC in the 70s.
However, the investigation “found evidence of encroachment on government-acquired land”, a DTCP official said.
As part of the investigation, HSIIDC also conducted a physical survey of the area, which showed the alleged encroachments of Kataria, Chetan Thakran, Roshni Dahiya, Moti Lal Kataria and Kulraj Kataria.
Based on its report, the DTCP this week wrote to the MCG to demolish the structure. “This is government-acquired land and we have written to MCG to vacate the encroachment,” said the DTCP official quoted above.
Kataria said, this is his family’s ancestral land. “The demarcation of the land was decided (by HSIIDC) without taking our part in it. We have objections to this demarcation and have approached a Gurugram court,” he said.
[ad_2]
Source link